Political Messaging: The Invisible Architecture of Victory

VK Rao – Hyderabad

You can also publish your article on our Journal ( Send your article at this Mail joidconsultancy@gmail.com /Ph – 8617562543 WA-7584931893 )

When electoral results are declared, what people see are votes, seats, and winners. What they rarely see is the invisible architecture behind those outcomes: political messaging. 

It is the backbone of every campaign strategy — subtle, pervasive, and often more decisive than rallies or manifestos. As a political strategist, I believe messaging is to an election what design is to a product: you may not always notice it consciously, but its strength determines whether people connect, convert, and commit.

The Core Elements of Effective Messaging

Effective political messaging has at least three core dimensions:

1. Narrative — The grand, overarching story you tell: not just “what” you promise, but why you matter.
2. Framing — How issues are presented: which perspectives are highlighted, which problems are made urgent, which identities are elevated.
3. Emotion + Symbolism — The images, metaphors, taglines, rhetoric that spark emotional responses: anger, hope, fear, pride.

A campaign that masters narrative + framing + symbolism wins hearts; those that do not may win votes, but lose the mandate of belief.

Indian Politics: Messaging Under the Microscope

In India, the importance of messaging has increased dramatically since the 1990s, as party fragmentation, media proliferation, identity politics, and competitive digital ecosystems have multiplied the terrains where messages fight for attention.

• Identity Narratives: Parties like TDP in Andhra Pradesh, DMK/AIADMK in Tamil Nadu, and BJD in Odisha built strong regional identity narratives. For instance, when TDP emerged in 1982 under N.T. Rama Rao, the message was not simply “governance” but “Telugu pride,” a narrative that resonated deeply.
• Caste and Social Justice Framing: The SP, BSP, and RJD in UP and Bihar show how caste-based messaging — emphasizing social justice, inclusion, grievance of underrepresented groups — has shifted voting patterns. Mayawati’s BSP, for example, used strong images of Dalit dignity (statues, public welfare) as central to its communication.
• Performance and Development: In states like Karnataka and Gujarat, regional leaders often frame messages around visible infrastructure, law & order, storm resilience, etc. For example, in Gujarat under the BJP, though the national party brand is strong, local leadership repeatedly used “Vibrant Gujarat” and “Safe Gujarat” as framing tools.

Globally, we see messaging being decisive in elections.

• In the U.S., Barack Obama’s 2008 “Hope” and “Change” narratives were simple, optimistic, symbolic.
• In the UK, the “Get Brexit Done” slogan proved how a short phrase, repeated with consistency, can dominate political discourse.
• In Brazil, Jair Bolsonaro’s messaging often emphasized law-and-order and nationalism, leveraging symbolism and distrust in elites, rather than detailed policy discussions.

The lesson: universal ambitions + emotional resonance + simplicity = powerful electoral messaging.

Messaging Strengths & Weaknesses in Indian Elections

Over the last three decades, I have observed certain patterns in Indian electoral messaging — repeated strengths, common blind spots, and risky flaws.

• Strength in Local Resonance: Regional parties that win usually have messaging deeply attuned to local cultures, festivals, grievances. DMK’s use of Tamil cultural symbols, BRS’s promise of Telangana identity, TMC’s emphasis on Bengali pride — these resonate where national parties sometimes sound generic.
• Weakness in Consistency: Many parties shift messages between election cycles — promising populist freebies this time, then development or governance the next. Voters notice inconsistency. Message drift harms trust.
• Risk of Over-Promising: When messaging exaggerates capacities (e.g., infrastructure promises, subsidy promises), failure to deliver creates backlash. In Telangana, for example, promises related to farmer welfare and rural infrastructure played large roles in campaigns; years when these didn’t meet expectations saw significant vote share erosion for the ruling party.
• Branding & Symbol Usage: How leaders use symbols—flags, songs, slogans—matters. In the 2014 Lok Sabha election, “Modi ki guarantee” or “Abki baar, 300 paar” were more than slogans — they were narratives that sharpened perceptions. Similarly, in Andhra, TDP and YSRCP used leader-images, regional symbolism, cinematic references heavily, because these connect deeply in vernacular contexts.
• Digital Messaging Landscape: Increasingly, message content and timing in social media, WhatsApp, reels/shorts, and local influencers matters as much as physical rallies. The 2019 and 2024 general elections saw heavy investment in micro-targeting, sentiment shaping, poll-prediction counter-narratives. Strategists who ignored digital feedback loops mostly suffered.

Cases of Messaging Driven Rise & Rapid Fall

Looking at regional party performance data, messaging misfires often precede collapses.

• The Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS, now renamed BRS) won Telangana comfortably in 2014 with ~44.2% vote share. In 2018 it improved further, but by 2023 its vote share dropped to about 37.3%, partly due to fatigue with the narrative (promise vs delivery), perceptions of nepotism, and controversies that contradicted earlier messaging.
• In Andhra Pradesh, YSR Congress Party (YSRCP), founded in 2011, used “Mahaprasthanam” and welfare-first messages to win 2019 with nearly 49.95% vote share. But by 2024, the message of governance failed to counter TDP’s narrative of change strongly enough, and YSRCP was reduced dramatically in seats despite earlier dominance. The expectation management and shifting public mood played roles.
• On the national level, parties that tried to replicate regional messaging at scale without adjusting framing often saw mixed results. Promises of development and welfare that resonate in state assemblies sometimes lose effectiveness in Lok Sabha polls because the voter considers national security, foreign affairs, and macro-economy more critically. Messaging that can span local + national space (both ritual identity / local grievance + national performance) have done better.

The Proprietorship vs Pvt Ltd Metaphor

Regional parties are proprietorships: one leader, or a family, often drives the messaging, the narrative, the brand. The advantages are clarity of voice, fast decisions, deep emotional bonds with voters, flexibility to adapt quickly. But proprietorships also carry risks: leadership voids are fatal, message misalignment can’t be corrected through committees, and succession is often messy.

National parties, by contrast, resemble private limited companies. They have governance structures, internal feedback systems, multiple leaders, institutional memory. Their messaging is more standardized, but also more deliberative. They often have more resources, but less agility.

For a regional proprietorship to succeed long-term, it needs to absorb some strengths of the private limited style—build cadres, build successor leadership, have mechanisms to monitor message real-time (feedback loops), keep core identity intact while adapting framing when needed.

Future of Political Messaging in India

As we move forward, messaging will continue to evolve. Younger voters expect authenticity. Symbolism without substance will be seen through. Misleading leads will be punished by social media amplification. Regional parties might have advantage here: they can speak local language, local issues, tell local stories.

To last, any party (regional or national) must ground its messaging in delivery. Messages that promise but fail create distrust; messaging aligned with visible performance (roads, schools, health) endures. Parties must choose between being headline-makers or trust-builders. Emotional appeal must be matched by visible action. Messaging and governance must walk together.

Political messaging isn’t a cosmetic layer—it shapes what people believe about who they are, what their future might be, and who deserves their trust. In Indian elections, messaging has become an invisible battlefield—where narrative, identity, emotion, and symbol often matter more than policy sheets or manifestos.

As a strategist, I believe that the most successful parties will be those that harness both the proprietorship strengths of regional identity and the structural discipline of national style. Because elections reward stories— but history rewards substantiation.

Our other articles : The Unspoken Reality : Read This Before You Sign|Bihar 2025: The Four-Way Showdown | AAP in Bihar: Ambition, Experiment, or Emerging Alternative? | The Kavitha Factor : Telangana’s Shifting Politics | Why CPM failed to expand in Bihar Since its inception in 1964 | The Decline of CPI in Bihar Politics: From Vanguard to the Margins | The Quad As An Asian NATO | 100 Best Books of the 21st Century by The New York Times | How Bihar’s SIR Revision Threatens Congress’s Chances in Its Mission 58| From Sushasan Babu to Survival Babu | PK’s 2030 Gameplan | Does Bengal Have a PR Problem? | A scenario of “What ifs” in Bihar | German Chancellor Fellowship discussion |Mission 58: How Congress Plans to Flip Bihar | Bengal Bellwether – 2 | Bengal Bellwether – 1 |   India United – India’s message is loud & clear on terrorism a diplomatic strike on terror| The Indian Stock Market is bleeding | SUPER NARI – 25 | Caste and the Ballot in Bihar |  The suicidal mission of Pakistan’s so called ‘Establishment’  |  Who is Responsible for Bihar’s Migration Crisis? |  Why Congress must go solo in Bihar |   Jai Bhim | Old is Gold , Resurrection of ‘Dynasty Politics’ |  China Faces 125% Tariff by USA: A Strategic Opportunity for India |  When the Accuser Becomes the Accused

Books that enriches – Westbengal Changing Colours Chnaging Challenges by Sitaram Sharma | India after Gandhi by Ramchandra Guha | Contesting democratic deficit by Salman Khurshid |   The election that surprised India By Rajdeep Sardesai